|
Difference |
diff --git a/handbook.md b/handbook.md index 535f8b7..c43390a 100644 --- a/handbook.md +++ b/handbook.md @@ -964,30 +964,29 @@ misconduct; and 3) grade appeals. * For faculty grievances not related to academic freedom violations (see [Chapter Five: Faculty Grievance Procedures, Section - 2](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-2)) for the details of the + 2](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-2) for the details of the faculty grievance process not related to academic freedom violations), subcommittees consisting of three elected and two appointed members of FRC have the power to review and to require reconsideration of: - A. The Provost's decision not to renew a probationary, + A) The Provost's decision not to renew a probationary, tenure-track appointment; - B. Decisions not to renew or to terminate appointments of secured + B) Decisions not to renew or to terminate appointments of secured nontenure-track faculty members on 3-year or 5 (or more)-year contracts; - C. Negative decisions on tenure; and + C) Negative decisions on tenure; and - D. Negative decisions on promotions of tenured, tenure-track, and + D) Negative decisions on promotions of tenured, tenure-track, and nontenure-track faculty members; where the action, decision, or recommendation is alleged by an aggrieved faculty member to result from: - 1. improper procedure; or - - 2. discrimination based on race, sex, age, color, national origin, + i. improper procedure; or + ii. discrimination based on race, sex, age, color, national origin, religion, genetic identity, disability, gender identity or expression, marital or parental status, sexual orientation, transgender status, veteran status, or any other protected @@ -999,7 +998,7 @@ misconduct; and 3) grade appeals. Policy](chapter-10.html#sexual-misconduct-policy); [Policy on Research Conduct](chapter-10.html#policy-on-research-conduct); or [Policy on Faculty - Conduct](chapter-10.html#policy-on-faculty-conduct). Selection of + Conduct](chapter-10.html#policy-on-faculty-conduct)). Selection of the fact finding committee is conducted so as to ensure members are unbiased and have the appropriate expertise and diversity as necessary for a particular case.