diff --git a/handbook.md b/handbook.md
index 27b734a..3c0ea5b 100644
--- a/handbook.md
+++ b/handbook.md
@@ -2006,12 +2006,12 @@ Provost.  The appointment is also reviewed by the Committee on Tenure
 and Academic Freedom to see that the candidate's qualifications are
 commensurate with the tenure criteria for the appropriate track (see
 [Chapter Three: Tenure, Section
-3](chapter-3.html#chapter-3-section-2)).  If the appointment is at the
+3](chapter-3.html#chapter-3-section-3)).  If the appointment is at the
 full rank in either track, then it is also reviewed by Committee on
 Appointments and Promotion to see that the candidate's qualifications
 are commensurate with the criteria used for promotion to the stated
 rank in the appropriate track (see [Chapter Four: Promotions, Section
-2](chapter-4.html#chapter-4-section-1aii)).
+2](chapter-4.html#chapter-4-section-2)).
 
 Once the Provost has approved the appointment, they forward an
 official offer letter to the candidate.  The precise terms and
@@ -4992,7 +4992,7 @@ the Procedure for Complaints of Academic Freedom Violations (see
 Bylaw Three, Section II](chapter-1.html#ctaf)) and by the Faculty
 Grievance Procedure (see [Chapter Five: Faculty Grievance Procedures,
 Section 2](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-2); and [Chapter One:
-Governance, Bylaw Three, Section IX](chapter-1.html#frc)).
+Governance, Bylaw Three, Section X](chapter-1.html#frc)).
 
 ### b. The Promotion Dossier: Documentation and Evaluation {#chapter-4-section-3b}
 
@@ -5658,7 +5658,7 @@ the investigation.
 If the complainant is not willing to expand the scope of the
 investigation in this manner, then the AFS will proceed to the
 preliminary finding part of the decision phase ([Section
-b.iii.1](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-1biii1)) and make a decision
+b.iii](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-1biii)) and make a decision
 that the available evidence in the case does not establish that an
 academic freedom violation occurred ([Section
 b.iii.1](chapter-5.html#chapter-5-section-1biii1), c. *Not Enough
@@ -5697,7 +5697,7 @@ action is required.
 Once the AFS has all available evidence or has enough evidence to
 reach a preliminary finding, the process enters the decision phase.
 
-#### iii. Decision Phase
+#### iii. Decision Phase {#chapter-5-section-1biii}
 
 ##### 1. Preliminary Finding {#chapter-5-section-1biii1}
 
@@ -8857,7 +8857,7 @@ notify the Respondent of the additional potential violations and give
 the Respondent ten (10) days to provide a written response to the
 additional potential violations. This deadline may be extended by the
 Dean as necessary under the circumstances.  The Dean will treat any
-new unrelated allegation as a separate Complaint starting at Section 6
+new unrelated allegation as a separate Complaint starting at Section f
 of this Policy ([Initial Review of
 Allegations](chapter-10.html#chapter-10-section-I6)).